Coronial
NSWother

Inquest into the disappearance and suspected death of Peter Claux

Deceased

Peter Dorian Claux

Demographics

unknown

Coroner

Decision ofDeputy State Coroner O'Neil

Date of death

2022-05-24

Finding date

2024-11-14

Cause of death

Unascertained

AI-generated summary

Peter Dorian Claux disappeared in Bournda National Park, NSW between 24 May and 2 June 2022. His remains were not located during the inquest, and cause and manner of death remain unascertained. This case highlights the challenges in investigating missing persons in remote locations where bodies cannot be recovered for forensic examination. While not a clinical case, it emphasises the importance of thorough search protocols and inter-agency coordination in missing person investigations.

AI-generated summary — refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.

Full text

CORONERS COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES Inquest: Inquest into the disappearance and suspected death of Peter Claux Hearing dates: 14 November 2024 Date of judgment: 14 November 2024 Place of judgment: Coroners Court of NSW, Lidcombe Judgment of: Deputy State Coroner, Magistrate David O'Neil Catchwords: CORONIAL LAW - Missing person, search, and whether missing person is now deceased.

File number: 2023/00102003 Representation: Coronial Advocate assisting: (Sgt) Sam Chahrouk Findings Identity: The person who died was Peter Dorian Claux Time of death: Mr Claux died between the 24th of May 2022 and 2nd of June 2022 Place of death: Bournda National Park, Bournda NSW.

Cause of death: Unascertained Manner of death: Unascertained

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries are for educational purposes only and must not be treated as legal documents. Report an inaccuracy.