Coronial
TASED

Coroner's Finding: Barnett Catherine Diana

Deceased

Catherine Diana Barnett

Demographics

55y, female

Date of death

2021-03-13

Finding date

2021-12-13

Cause of death

acute myocardial infarction due to right coronary artery thrombosis

AI-generated summary

A 55-year-old woman presenting to the emergency department with 24 hours of chest pain, arm pain, sweating and vomiting was discharged without an ECG or troponin measurement. She had an abdominal CT suggesting cholecystitis, but the coroner's medical advisor noted that her symptoms strongly indicated possible acute coronary syndrome, particularly given her smoking history. She returned three days later in shock and suffered fatal cardiac arrest from acute myocardial infarction due to right coronary artery thrombosis. The key clinical lesson is that chest pain with typical features of acute coronary syndrome requires ECG and troponin testing regardless of alternative diagnoses; these investigations are non-invasive and essential for risk stratification in smokers presenting with concerning symptoms.

AI-generated summary — refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.

Specialties

emergency medicinecardiology

Error types

diagnosticdelay

Contributing factors

  • failure to perform ECG on presentation
  • failure to measure troponin levels
  • misattribution of symptoms to abdominal pathology
  • inadequate risk stratification in smoker with chest pain
  • premature discharge without ruling out acute coronary syndrome
Full text

MAGISTRATES COURT of TASMANIA

CORONIAL DIVISION Record of Investigation into Death (Without Inquest) Coroners Act 1995 Coroners Rules 2006 Rule 11 I, Simon Cooper, Coroner, having investigated the death of Catherine Diana Barnett Find, pursuant to Section 28(1) of the Coroners Act 1995, that a) The identity of the deceased is Catherine Diana Barnett; b) Ms Barnett died in hospital as a result of a right coronary artery thrombosis; c) The cause of Ms Barnett’s death was an acute myocardial infarct; and d) Ms Barnett died on 13 March 2021 at Calvary Hospital, Lenah Valley in Tasmania.

In making the above findings I have had regard to the evidence gained in the investigation into Ms Barnett’s death. The evidence includes:

• Police Report of Death for the Coroner;

• Calvary Health Care Tasmania – Death Report to Coroner

• Affidavits establishing identity and life extinct;

• Report – Dr Christopher Lawrence, Forensic Pathologist

• Report – Dr Anthony J Bell, Medical Advisor Coroner’s Office;

• Medical records précis prepared by Ms Libby Newman, Forensic Nurse

• Medical Records – Augusta Medical Centre;

• Medical Records – Calvary Health Care Tasmania; and

• Letter, Calvary Lenah Valley Hospital 15 November 2021.

Introduction Ms Barnett was aged 55 at the time of her death. She was in a long-term relationship and a mother of four children. Aside from being a smoker, Ms Barnett had no medical history of note.

Circumstances of death At about 5.30 pm on Sunday, 7 March 2021, Ms Barnett went to the Emergency Department of Calvary Hospital in Lenah Valley. Her medical records kept by the Hospital indicate that she

described a 24 hour history of feeling unwell with particular aches and pains in the arms and chest with associated sweating. Noted in the history were episodes of vomiting.

Ms Barnett was examined and her vital signs recorded in her records. Her temperature was a maximum of 37.6°C, BP 135/80 mmHg and heart rate 80 bpm. The notes record her chest as being clear and heart sounds normal. Her abdomen and calves were not tender.

Blood tests were performed at about 7.00 pm. The results of that testing showed an elevated white cell count and slightly elevated monocytes. However Ms Barnett’ C reactive protein was normal.

An abdominal CT scan was carried out which indicated possible acute cholecystitis.

Notably, no ECG was ordered or carried out.

Ms Barnett was kept in the ED overnight, treated with IV fluids and discharged the following morning. She rested at home for the next three days before returning to work on Thursday and Friday.

The following morning, Saturday, 13 March 2021, Ms Barnett was taken back to the Emergency Department at Calvary Hospital by her partner. She was lethargic, weak, sweating and pale.

Staff assisted her to a cubicle where her blood pressure was found to be very low and she was tachycardic. Medical staff transferred her to the resuscitation area where IV fluids were commenced and a MET call made shortly afterwards. Resuscitation efforts were commenced and continued prior to Ms Barnett being transferred urgently to the hospital’s Critical Care Unit. Shortly after her arrival in the Critical Care Unit, Ms Barnett suffered a cardiac arrest.

Attempts at resuscitation included intubation and ventilation but were unsuccessful. Ms Barnett died at about 10.20 am.

Investigation The fact of Ms Barnett’s death was reported in accordance with the requirements of the Coroners Act 1995, although I note unlike hospitals run by the Tasmanian Health Service, Calvary Hospital does not utilise a Hospital Report of Death to the Coroner. I consider that there would be considerable merit in the hospital adopting such an approach.

In any event I return to Mrs Barnett’s death. Following formal identification her body was taken to the mortuary at the Royal Hobart Hospital for autopsy. The Forensic Pathologist who carried out the autopsy, Dr Christopher Lawrence, provided a report in which he expressed the opinion that the cause of Ms Barnett’s death was an acute myocardial infarction due to right coronary artery thrombosis. I accept Dr Lawrence’s opinion.

The circumstances of Ms Barnett’s death were reviewed by the Coronial Division Medico-Legal panel. As part of that investigation, her medical records were obtained and carefully reviewed.

In addition, Ms Barnett’s course of treatment was analysed by the Medical Advisor to the Coronial Division, Dr Anthony J Bell MB BS MD FRACPM FCICM. Dr Bell provided a report in which he said that: “Chest pain, arm pain, sweating, lethargy and vomiting in a heavy smoker indicate a need to perform a more detailed medical history directed an [sic] ischaemic heart disease. An electrocardiogram was essential as was a troponin level (or two measurements). This should have led to the correct diagnosis and appropriate treatment.” I accept Dr Bell’s opinion. Ms Barnett presented to the emergency department of a hospital and reported symptoms consistent with a myocardial infarction. At the very least, an ECG should have been performed and her troponin levels tested. Had either, or both, been carried out, it is reasonable to conclude that the existence of her ischaemic heart disease would have been identified.

Instead, Ms Barnett was discharged home with an acute, undiagnosed and ultimately fatal condition.

These findings were sent, in draft, to Calvary Hospital for comment. A reply was received from the hospital, to which I have had specific regard. However, nothing in the letter from the hospital persuades me it is appropriate in any way to change the conclusions I have reached.

Comments and Recommendations The circumstances of Ms Barnett’s death are not such as to require me to make any comments or recommendations pursuant to Section 28 of the Coroners Act 1995.

I convey my sincere condolences to the family and loved ones of Ms Barnett.

Dated: 13 December 2021 at Hobart in the State of Tasmania.

Simon Cooper Coroner

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries are for educational purposes only and must not be treated as legal documents. Report an inaccuracy.