Coronial
TAScommunity

Coroner's Finding: Vanderfeen, Jacinta

Deceased

Jacinta Fay Vanderfeen

Demographics

54y, female

Date of death

2022-06-11

Finding date

2023-05-23

Cause of death

Blunt trauma of the head and chest caused by being crushed by a falling tree

AI-generated summary

Jacinta Fay Vanderfeen, aged 54, died from blunt trauma to head and chest after being struck and crushed by a falling gumtree while assisting a friend during extreme weather conditions (111 km/h wind gusts). She was trapped under the tree and died rapidly from her injuries. Emergency responders, including a firefighter who administered CPR, attended promptly but extraction was delayed due to ongoing danger from additional unstable trees. This was an unavoidable accident in extreme environmental conditions; no medical management issues arose as death was immediate upon impact.

AI-generated summary — refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.

Contributing factors

  • Extreme weather conditions with wind gusts of 111 km/h
  • Large unstable gumtree fell during high wind event
Full text

MAGISTRATES COURT of TASMANIA

CORONIAL DIVISION Record of Investigation into Death (Without Inquest) Coroners Act 1995 Coroners Rules 2006 Rule 11 I, Olivia McTaggart, Coroner, having investigated the death of Jacinta Fay Vanderfeen Find, pursuant to Section 28(1) of the Coroners Act 1995, that a) The identity of the deceased is Jacinta Fay Vanderfeen, date of birth 6 March 1968.

b) Mrs Vanderfeen was 54 years of age and lived with her husband in Railton. Mr and Mrs Vanderfeen have two sons and, at the time of her death, Mrs Vanderfeen worked as a manager for the University of Tasmania.

At about 3.45pm on Saturday 11 June 2022, Mr and Mrs Vanderfeen, together with a friend, Peter Ransom, drove to the home of Jane Beaton in Beulah to provide her with assistance. Mrs Beaton had called them and said that a tree had just fallen on her house in the high winds. Mrs Beaton was a close friend of Mrs Vanderfeen and her husband had passed away two weeks previously. When they arrived at Mrs Beaton’s house to help her, the wind was extremely strong, in line with the Bureau of Meteorology forecast. The Bureau of Meteorology, in fact, reported at that time in Sheffield there were gusts of 111 km/h, this weather station being only 6 kilometres from Mrs Beaton’s house.

Upon arriving at Mrs Beaton’s house at about 4.30pm, Mr and Mrs Vanderfeen and Mr Ransom went into the house and started to assist with safety tasks and retrieving personal items for Mrs Beaton. Mrs Vanderfeen and her husband then left the house to return to the car, intending to leave the property quickly due to the severity of the wind. As they exited the house, a very large gumtree fell, its branches striking and pinning down Mrs Vanderfeen and injuring Mr Vanderfeen.

Mr Ransom, hearing the crash of the tree from inside, went out of the house and found Mrs Vanderfeen trapped under a branch and unresponsive, with only the faintest pulse detectable. Mr Ransom, a firefighter, administered CPR to Ms Vanderfeen and cleared her airways. Emergency services were called and, initially, Tasmania Fire Service and State Emergency Service volunteers arrived at the scene. Police officers subsequently arriving assessed that the severity of the wind

at the time of their arrival made the situation clearly dangerous. It was particularly noted that another four or five trees of a similar size as those already fallen were moving excessively in the wind. Ambulance paramedics attended and determined that Mrs Vanderfeen was deceased. I am satisfied upon the evidence that she died rapidly after the tree impacted her body. With difficulty, Mr Vanderfeen was able to be evacuated. He was treated in hospital for two weeks with numerous injuries.

The attending police officers and emergency services personnel decided to remove all persons from the scene due to the danger. Mrs Vanderfeen was unable to be removed from under the tree in a timely manner and she was extracted and transported to the Launceston mortuary the following day.

c) Mrs Vanderfeen died as a result of blunt trauma of the head and chest caused by being crushed by a falling tree.

d) Mrs Vanderfeen died on 11 June 2022 at Beulah, Tasmania.

In making the above findings, I have had regard to the evidence gained in the investigation into Mrs Vanderfeen’s death. The evidence includes:

• Police Report of Death for the Coroner;

• Affidavits confirming identification;

• Opinion of the forensic pathologist regarding cause of death;

• Toxicology report of Forensic Science Service Tasmania;

• General practitioner records for Mrs Vanderfeen;

• Two affidavits of Mr Kenneth Vanderfeen, husband of Mrs Vanderfeen;

• Affidavit of Constable Timothy Ford, police officer who attended the scene;

• Affidavits of two Forensic Services officers, including photographs and drone footage;

• Affidavit of Jane Beaton, property owner; and

• Affidavit of Peter Ransom, friend at the scene.

Comments and Recommendations I acknowledge the efforts of all those who assisted and placed themselves at risk at what was both a dangerous, difficult and tragic scene.

I also extend my appreciation to investigating officer, Sergeant Gavin Thomas, for his investigation and report.

The circumstances of Mrs Vanderfeen’s death are not such as to require me to make any recommendations pursuant to Section 28 of the Coroners Act 1995.

I convey my sincere condolences to the family and loved ones of Mrs Vanderfeen.

Dated: 23 May 2023 at Hobart in the State of Tasmania.

Olivia McTaggart Coroner

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries are for educational purposes only and must not be treated as legal documents. Report an inaccuracy.