Coronial
TASother

Coroner's Finding: Unidentified Human Remains

Demographics

male

Date of death

0772

Finding date

2022-07-04

Cause of death

unknown

AI-generated summary

A left femur was recovered from Carlton Beach, Tasmania in July 2022. Forensic examination indicated the bone was human, significantly weathered, and from an older adolescent or adult. Initial DNA testing proved inconclusive for identification. Radiocarbon dating subsequently revealed the remains dated to 772-991 A.D., confirming Pre-European aboriginal origin. The coroner referred the matter to the Tasmanian Aboriginal Centre for appropriate handling. This case highlights the value of advanced forensic techniques, including radiocarbon dating, in identifying historical remains and the importance of cultural protocols in managing indigenous human remains.

AI-generated summary — refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.

Specialties

forensic medicine

Coroner's recommendations

  1. Refer remains to Tasmanian Aboriginal Centre for appropriate handling and management
Full text

Lyd ey MAGISTRATES COURT of TASMANIA

TASMANIA

ores cour CORONIAL DIVISION

Record of Investigation into Death (Without Inquest)

Coroners Act 1995 Coroners Rules 2006 Rule II

|, Simon Cooper, Coroner, having investigated the circumstances surrounding an unidentified

femur located at Carlton Beach Tasmania, make the following finding.

Introduction

I. On [4 July 2022, a left femur was located by a member of the public in a rock pool at Carlton Beach, Southern Tasmania. The femur was handed to police at Sorell and the

matter duly reported pursuant to the Coroners Act 1995 (the “Act”).

Investigation

  1. An investigation under the Act was commenced. The femur was examined by the State Forensic Pathologist, who confirmed that it was human. On 18 July 2022, the femur was examined by experienced forensic anthropologist, Dr Anne-Marie Williams. Dr

Williams provided a report. In that report she said:

“The bone is very weathered from exposure to the environment over a long period of time, The bone is dry and bleached grey-white, with significant degradation of the bone

surface and algal staining on the posterior aspect.

The proximal and distal ends of the bone are missing and the ends of the bone are worn

suggesting that the bone has been in a watery environment for a long period of time.

Due to the poor condition of the bone it is difficult to identify, however, it is most likely

that the bone is a left femur.

The condition of the remains indicate that this person died at least 10 years ago but it

is likely that this person died several decades ago.

Due to the poor condition of the bone it is not possible to determine the sex or ancestry

of this person.

It is not possible to determine the age of this person, however, the length and overall size of the bone suggests that they would have been an older adolescent or adult when

they died.”

  1. At that stage further identification was impossible as was the determination of the cause of death. | note that there was no basis, at all, to have reached any suspicion as to the

identity or ancestry of the femur.

4, The femur was securely stored until developments in the National DNA Program for Unidentified and Missing Persons enabled further forensic biological investigations to be carried out. In September 2022, the femur was sent to the National Laboratory for

further testing.

  1. Meanwhile, DNA testing was undertaken at the laboratory of Forensic Science Service Tasmania against samples relating to persons known to have been missing in the general

area of Carlton Beach. Those tests were negative.

  1. Testing at the National Laboratory did not identify any ‘usable’ DNA to aid in the

identification of the femur, other than to confirm the femur was that of a male person.

  1. However, radiocarbon dating of the bone indicated that it was much older than previously thought, dating from between 772 and 991 A.D. and was therefore PreEuropean. The report containing that information was provided to the State Forensic Pathologist who in turn recently reported to the Coronial Division the outcome of

those investigations with respect to the age of the femur.

  1. The updated investigation file, with all the above information, was received by me on 2

May 2024.

Conclusion

  1. Having formed the view (that is to say reasonably suspecting having regard to the new

evidence) that the remains are aboriginal, | refer the matter to the Tasmanian

Aboriginal Centre, the relevant aboriginal organisation approved by the Attorney

General, pursuant to section 23 of the Act.

Dated: 3 May 2024 at Hobart in the State of Tasmania.

Simon Cooper

Coroner

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries are for educational purposes only and must not be treated as legal documents. Report an inaccuracy.