Coronial
VIChome

Finding into death of Dorothy May Williams

Deceased

Dorothy May Williams

Demographics

85y, female

Coroner

Coroner Caitlin English

Date of death

2013-12-03

Finding date

2015-09-10

Cause of death

complications of oesophageal cancer

AI-generated summary

Dorothy Williams was an 85-year-old woman with intellectual impairment and dementia who died from complications of oesophageal cancer. She was diagnosed with inoperable oesophageal cancer in 2012 and managed palliatively at home with a stent insertion. A not-for-resuscitation status was established in July 2012 following multidisciplinary discussion. In her final illness, symptomatic management with medications was provided by her GP. The coroner found no issues with health management that affected her cause of death. This case highlights appropriate palliative care planning and end-of-life decision-making for a vulnerable person with communication difficulties living in residential care.

AI-generated summary — refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.

Specialties

geriatric medicineoncologypalliative caregeneral practice

Drugs involved

Rivotril

Contributing factors

  • progressive dementia
  • inoperable oesophageal cancer
  • advanced age
Full text

IN THE CORONERS COURT OF VICTORIA AT MELBOURNE

Court Reference: COR 2013 5546

FINDING INTO DEATH WITHOUT INQUEST

Form 38 Rule 60(2)

  • Section 67 of the Coroners Act 2008

I, CAITLIN ENGLISH, Coroner having investigated the death of Dorothy May Williams

without holding an inquest: find that the identity of the deceased was Dorothy May Williams born on 18 January 1928 and the death occurred on 3 December 2013 at 1/28 Highland Street, Kingsbury, Victoria from: l(a) COMPLICATIONS OF OESOPHAGEAL CANCER

Pursuant to section 67(1) of the Coroners Act 2008, there is a public interest to be served in making findings with respect to the following circumstances:

  1. Dorothy Williams was 85 years of age at the time of her death. Since 1996, she had resided at Highland Group Home in Kingsbury, having spent the majority of her life in the care of the Department of ITuman Services, She had regular contact with her sister, Louise Gregory,

(who in later years was sulfering from dementia) and her brother in law, Robert Gregory.

  1. Ms Williams had an intellectual and hearing impairment. She had very little verbal speech

and communicated with basic sign language or gestures.

  1. At the time of her death, Ms Williams was ‘in care’ pursuant to s 3 Coroners Act 2008 (the Act).

  2. A coroner must hold an inquest if the deceased was, immediately before death, a person

placed in care, in accordance with section 52(2)(b) of the Act.

Pursuant to section 52(3A) of the Act, I am not required to hold an inquest in these

circumstances, if I consider that the death was due to ‘natural causes’.

In accordance with section 53(3B) of the Act, a death may be considered to be due to ‘natural causes’ if the coroner has received a report from a medical investigator, in accordance with the rules, that includes an opinion that the death was due to ‘natural

causes’, I have received a report in this case.!

I also note that no issues were identified regarding the health management of Ms Williams, which affected her cause of death. Therefore, I make my findings with respect to the

circumstances and exercise my discretion not to hold a public hearing through an inquest.

A police investigation was conducted into the circumstances of her death.

A brief prepared by Victoria Police for the coroner includes statements obtained from Ms Williams’ treating health practitioner, the supervisor of her group home, her brother in law and the coroner’s investigator. T have drawn on all of this material as to the factual matters

in this finding.

Health History

In 2006, Ms Williams was diagnosed with progressive brain atrophy, a form of dementia.

In 2012, after a decline in health, and spates of vomiting, she was referred by her GP, Dr

Brett Hunt to geriatrician, Dr Rabin Sinnappu.

On 5 June 2012 Dr Sinnappu ordered a gastroscopy, which returned a diagnosis of oesophageal cancer. The cancer was deemed inoperable and treated palliatively following a care plan meeting at the Austin hospital. A stent was inserted and Ms Williams was cared

for at home.

After the cancer diagnosis, in July 2012, Ms Williams’ status was confirmed to be not for resuscitation following review by Dr Hunt and discussion with family and the

recommendation from Melbourne City Mission.

Ms Williams was on symptomatic treatment and as she became unwell, Dr Hunt would

prescribe medications to relieve pain or discomfort.

' Dr Michael Burke, Supplementary Report, 24 June 2014,

Events Proximate to Death

17,

From 2 December 2013, Ms Williams became bed ridden due to decreased physical strength and mobility.

On 3 December 2013, Ms Williams’ breathing became laboured. She was administered two drops of Rivotril in an attempt to relieve her breathing distress, initially without effect. Her

breathing then slowed.

Emergency services were contacted. Ambulance arrived and confirmed death at 8.20pm.

Police attended the scene,

Post Mortem Examination

  1. Forensic Pathologist Dr Michael Burke at the Victorian Institute of Forensic Medicine completed a post mortem inspection and report on 8 December 2013. Dr Burke formulated the cause of death. I accept his opinion. Dr Burke confirmed that the death was due to natural causes.”

Finding

I find that died Dorothy May Williams died from complications of oesophageal cancer.

I direct that a copy of this finding be provided to the following: Mr Robert Gregory

Senior Constable Teneille Bamford

Pursuant to section 73(1B) of the Coroners Act 2008, I direct that a copy of this finding be

published on the internet.

Signature:

CAITLIN ENGLISH CORONER Date: 10 September 2015

? Dr Michael Burke, Supplementary Report, 24 June 2014.

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries are for educational purposes only and must not be treated as legal documents. Report an inaccuracy.