Coronial
VIChome

Finding into death of Seker Yildiz

Deceased

Seker Yildiz

Demographics

59y, female

Coroner

Deputy State Coroner Iain West

Date of death

2015-05-10

Finding date

2019-02-15

Cause of death

Sharp force injuries to the neck

AI-generated summary

Seker Yildiz, aged 59, died from sharp force injuries to the neck inflicted by her husband, Mr Dursun Yildiz, using a small axe at their home in Dallas, Victoria. The perpetrator had undiagnosed mental illness characterised by delusional beliefs that his life was at risk and auditory hallucinations. No discernible history of family violence existed prior to the fatal incident. Two independent psychiatrists diagnosed Mr Yildiz with a schizophrenic or delusional disorder. Despite contact with general medical services and English language classes, his mental illness went unidentified. The case highlights the critical need for mental health screening in community settings, particularly among vulnerable populations with language barriers, and recognition that domestic homicides can occur without prior violence indicators when mental illness is present.

AI-generated summary — refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.

Specialties

general practicepsychiatryforensic medicine

Error types

diagnostic

Drugs involved

paracetamol

Contributing factors

  • Perpetrator's undiagnosed mental illness - schizophrenic or delusional disorder
  • Delusional beliefs regarding threat to life
  • Auditory hallucinations commanding homicide
  • Limited English language skills limiting access to services
  • Lack of mental health screening in community settings
Full text

IN THE CORONERS COURT Court Reference: COR 2015 2302

OF VICTORIA AT MELBOURNE FINDING INTO DEATH WITHOUT INQUEST Form 38 Rule 60(2) Section 67 of the Coroners Act 2008

Findings of: IAIN WEST, ACTING STATE CORONER

Deceased: SEKER YILDIZ

Date of birth: 3 February 1956

Date of death: 10 May 2015

Cause of death: Sharp force injuries to the neck

Place of death: 22 Morwell Crescent, Dallas, Victoria

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Background

The purpose of a coronial investigation

Matters in relation to which a finding must, if possible, be made

  • Identity of the deceased, pursuant to section 67(1)(a) of the Act

  • Medical cause of death, pursuant to section 67(1)(b) of the Act

  • Circumstances in which the death occurred, pursuant to section 67(1)(c)

of the Act Comments pursuant to section 67(3) of the Act

Findings and conclusion

HIS HONOUR:

BACKGROUND

Mrs Seker Yildiz (Mrs Yildiz) was born in Turkey on 3 February 1956 and was 59 years-old at the time of her death. Mrs Yildiz married Mr Hasan Sahin in 1974 and they had two sons named Tuncay Sahin (Tuncay) and Olcay Sahin.!

Mrs Yildiz separated from Mr Sahin in 1983 and then re-married with Mr Dursun Yildiz (Mr Yildiz) in Turkey during 1985. Mr and Mrs Yildiz had two children of their relationship, a daughter and son.?

In 2008, Mrs Yildiz migrated to Australia without Mr Yildiz and lived with her son Tuncay and his family in the outer north suburbs of Melbourne. In 2009, Mr Yildiz also migrated to Australia and lived with Mrs Yildiz and her son Tuncay.

In 2013, Mr and Mrs Yildiz rented a house together in the suburb of Dallas and then later in 2014 they moved to another property at 22 Morwell Crescent, Dallas where they resided together until the fatal incident.‘

Both Mr and Mrs Yildiz had limited English language skills and had minimal contact with services in their community. Ms Yildiz attended the Blair Medical Clinic for general medical

care and English language classes at Melbourne Polytechnic.

Mr Yildiz had contact with Centrelink and received a Carers payment from 17 May 2013 until the time of the fatal incident as he cared for Mrs Yildiz who suffered chronic foot and back

issues due to her weight.°

THE PURPOSE OF A CORONIAL INVESTIGATION

Mrs Yildiz’s death constituted a ‘reportable death’ under the Coroners Act 2008 (Vic) (the

Act), as the death occurred in Victoria and was violent, unexpected and not from natural

causes:®

' Coronial Brief, Statement of Tuncay Sahin dated 27 May 2015, 86

2 Psychiatric report of Dr Clare McInerney dated 14 April 2016, 3; Psychiatric report of Dr Lester Walton dated 19 November 2015, 3

3 Coronial Brief, Statement of Tuncay Sahin dated 27 May 2015, 87

  • Coronial Brief, Statement of Tuncay Sahin dated 27 May 2015, 88

5 Psychiatric report of Dr Clare McInerney dated 14 April 2016, 3

12,

The jurisdiction of the Coroners Court of Victoria is inquisitorial.’ The Act provides for a system whereby reportable deaths are independently investigated to ascertain, if possible, the identity of the deceased person, the. cause of death and the circumstances in which the death

occurred.®

It is not the role of the coroner to lay or apportion blame, but to establish the facts.’ It is also not the coroner’s role to determine criminal or civil liability arising from the death under

investigation,” or to determine disciplinary matters.

The expression “cause of death” refers to the medical cause of death, incorporating where

possible, the mode or mechanism of death.

For coronial purposes, the phrase “circumstances in which death occurred,”" refers to the context or background and surrounding circumstances of the death. Rather than being a consideration of all circumstances which might form part of a narrative culminating in the death, it is confined to those circumstances which are sufficiently proximate and causally

relevant to the death.

The broader purpose of coronial investigations is to contribute to a reduction in the number of preventable deaths, both through the observations made in the investigation findings and by the making of recommendations by coroners. This is generally referred to as the Court’s

“prevention” role.

Coroners are also empowered:

(a) to report to the Attomey-General on a death;!?

(b) to comment on any matter connected with the death they have investigated, including

matters of public health or safety and the administration of justice;!> and

(c) to make recommendations to any Minister or public statutory authority on any matter connected with the death, including public health or safety or the administration of

justice.’ These powers are the vehicles by which the prevention role may be advanced.

5 Section 4 Coroners Act 2008

7 Section 89(4) Coroners Act 2008

8 See Preamble and s 67, Coroners Act 2008 ° Keawn v Khan (1999) 1 VR 69

‘6 Section 69 (1)

1 Scetion 67(1)(c)

2 Section 72(1)

'3 Section 67(3)

  1. All coronial findings must be made based on proof of relevant facts on the balance of probabilities.'5 In determining these matters, 1 am guided by the principles enunciated in Briginshaw v Briginshaw."® The effect of this and similar authorities is that coroners should not make adverse findings against, or comments about individuals, unless the evidence

provides a comfortable level of satisfaction that they caused. or contributed to the death.

  1. In conducting this investigation, I have made a thorough forensic examination of the evidence including reading and considering the witness statements and other documents in the coronial

brief.

MATTERS IN RELATION TO WHICH A FINDING MUST, IF POSSIBLE, BE MADE Identity of the Deceased, pursuant to section 67(1)(a) of the Act

  1. Upon reviewing the available evidence, Coroner Phillip Byrne completed a-Form 8 Determination by Coroner of Identity of Deceased dated 15 May 2015, concluding that the identity of the deceased was Seker Yildiz born 3 February 1956.

  2. Identity is not in dispute in this matter and requires no further investigation.

Medical cause of death, pursuant to section 67(1)(b) of the Act

  1. On 12 May 2015, Dr Matthew Lynch, a Forensic Pathologist practising at the Victorian Institute of Forensic Medicine, conducted an autopsy upon the deceased’s body. Dr Lynch provided a written report, dated 25 August 2015, which concluded that Mrs Yildiz died from

sharp force injuries to the neck.

  1. A full toxicological analysis was negative for alcohol and only detected trace amounts of

paracetamol” (less than 5.0 mg/L).

20. Dr Lynch commented that:

(a) External examination of the body revealed evidence of multiple sharp force injuries to the head, neck and chest area. There were at least 35 incised type injuries observed to the head and neck region and at least 10 of these extended through the skin to the

subcutaneous fat and muscle tissue;

4 Section 72(2)

15 Re State Coroner; ex parte Minister for Health (2009) 261 ALR 152

16 (1938) 60 CLR 336

17 Paracetamol is an analgesic drug available in many proprietary products either by itself or in combination with other drugs such as codcine and propoxyphene. :

21,

(b) There were two major injuries on the anterior aspect of the neck which had resulted in division of the larynx and oesophagus, divided major blood vessels and incised the

anterior cervical spine;

(c) There were injuries noted to both hands on the body compromising’ bruise. and sharp

force injuries of a defence type; and

(d) The requisite degree of force required to produce the observed injuries was “severe”

given the significant bony injury.

I accept the cause of death proposed by Dr Lynch.

Circumstances in which the death occurred, pursuant to section 67(1)(c) of the Act

The available evidence in the coronial brief suggests that Mr Yildiz had armed himself with a small axe whilst at home at 22 Morwell Crescent, Dallas and killed Mrs Yildiz using the

small axe. This occurred at some point during the evening of the 10 May 2015.

On 11 May 2015 at 12.45pm, Mr Yildiz attended the Broadmeadows Police Station where he confessed to the Police that he had killed Mrs Yildiz the night before and that her body was

still at their home.

Police arrested Mr Yildiz at approximately 1.30pm and attended the residence on Morwell Crescent, Dallas at approximately 1.57pm. Police found Mrs Yildiz’s body lying on her back

on the lounge room floor with a blood-stained small axe in the kitchen.

Police observed that Mrs Yildiz’s body was covered with a blue coloured blanket and the upper body was covered with a scarf. Police confirmed that Mrs Yildiz was deceased and

noted major wounds to her neck and the right-hand side of her face.

COMMENTS PURSUANT TO SECTION 67(3) OF THE ACT

Criminal Proceedings

On 27 February 2017, Mr Yildiz was found liable to a Custodial Supervision Order and was committed to the custody of the Victorian Institute of Forensic Health for a nominal term of

25 years of supervision from 11 May 2015.

Family Violence

  1. The unexpected, unnatural and violent death of a person is a devastating event. It is important to recognise that violence perpetrated by an intimate family member is particularly shocking,

given the family unit is expected to be a place of trust, safety and protection.

  1. For the purposes of the Family Violence Protection Act 2008 (the Act), the relationship between Mr and Mrs Yildiz clearly fell within the definition of ‘family member'® under that Act. Moreover, Mr Yildiz’s actions by attacking Mrs Yildiz and causing her death constitutes

“family violence.’ !°

  1. Considering Mrs Yildiz’s death occurred under circumstances of family violence, I requested that the Coroners’ Prevention Unit (CPU) examine the circumstances of Mrs Yildiz’s death

as part of the Victorian Systemic Review of Family Violence Deaths (VSRFVD).”!

  1. Following the fatal incident, Mr Yildiz was psychologically assessed by two independent psychiatrists who formed the opinion that Mr Yildiz had “developed ‘the delusional belief...ultimately that his life was at risk...developed the idea that both he and his wife would be better off dead”.* Dr McInemey noted that Mr Yildiz believed in the moments prior to the fatal incident that “his stepson was outside the window with a gun aimed at him. He reports also hearing a voice at that time telling him to kill himself and his wife, in order to

enter heaven”? |

  1. The CPU accessed the. Victorian Homicide Register™* (VHIR) and retrieved data on similar intimate partner homicides with comparable factual backgrounds, including where an intimate partner homicide had occurred, there was no discernable history of family violence prior to the homicide and a schizophrenic, schizotypal or delusional disorder was present in the

perpetrator: The cases extracted from the VHR included both open and closed cases.

18 Family Violence Protection Act 2008, section 9(1)(b) ue pee Violence Protection Act 2008, section 5(1)(a)(i)

The Coroners Prevention Unit is a specialist service for Coroners established to strengthen their prevention role and

provide them with professional assistance on issues pertaining to public health and safety The VSRFVD provides assistance to Victorian Coroners to examine the circumstances in which family violence

deaths occur. In addition the VSRFVD collects and analyses information on family violence-relatcd deaths.

Together this information assists with the identification of systemic prevention-focused recommendations aimed at

reducing the incidence of family violence in the Victorian Community ® Psychiatric report of Dr Clare McInerney dated 14 April 2016, 11 3 Psychiatric report of Dr Clare McIncrncy dated 14 April 2016, 11 #4 The Victorian Homicide Register is a database maintained by the Coroners Prevention Unit that contains detailed information on the offender(s) and deceased(s) in all Victorian homicides reported to the Coroner since 2000. It comprises 223 data fields which capture information such as: socio-demographic characteristics; location information; presence and nature of physical and mental illness; service contact; and in cases where there was a history of family violence, information on the presence and nature of the violence.

  1. Since 2000, there have been 38 cases of intimate partner homicides where there has been no discernable history of family violence.” In only four of these cases, the perpetrator had some form of schizophrenia or suffered an acute psychotic delusional episode at the time of the fatal

incident.

  1. The available evidence suggests that there was no discernible history of family violence between Mr and Mrs Yildiz. The only services that had contact with both parties proximate to the fatal incident were Mrs Yildiz’s general practitioner at Blair Medical Centre and Melbourne Polytechnic, both of whom provided statements to the Court indicating that no

incidents or concerns of family violence were reported to them.””

  1. Whilst the death of Mrs Yildiz occurred within a family violence context, Mr Yildiz appears

to have been driven at the time of the fatal incident by his undiagnosed mental illness.”®

35, Jam satisfied, having considered all the available evidence, that no further investigation is

required.

FINDINGS AND CONCLUSION

  1. Having investigated the death, without holding an inquest, I make the following findings pursuant to section 67(1) of the Act:

a) the identity of the deceased was Seker Yildiz, born 3 February 1956;

b) the death occurred on 10 May 2015 at 22 Morwell Crescent, Dallas, Victoria, from

sharp force injuries to the neck; and c) the death occurred in the circumstances described above.

37. Iconvey my sincerest sympathy to Mrs Yildiz’s family.

25 COR 2000 0272; COR 2000 0456; COR 2000 1886; COR 2000 2180; COR 2000 3534; COR 2001 0497; COR 2001 2575; COR 2001 3882; COR 2002 0301; COR 2002 0361; COR 2002 1183; COR 2002 2384; COR 2003 0743; COR 2003 1273; COR 2003 1855; COR 2003 2563; COR 2003 2820; COR 2004 2341; COR 2004 2427; COR 2004 2782; COR 2004 4437; COR 2005 0173; COR 2005 1444; COR 2005 2768; COR 2006 1838; COR 2006 1863; COR 2006 2212; COR 2006 2328; COR 2007 2016; COR 2007 3505; COR 2008 2804; COR 2008 5577; COR 2010 1224; COR 2011 3580; COR 2013 5843; COR 2015 0145; COR 2016 2320; COR 2018 3620; COR 2015 3627

76 COR 2015 3627; COR 20013882; COR 2003 2820; COR 2004 2427; COR 2006 2212

27 Statement from Melbourne Polytechnic dated 16 October 2018; Statement from Blair Medical Clinic dated 4 December 2018

28 Psychiatric report of Dr Clare McInerney dated 14 April 2016, 9-12, 21; Psychiatric report of Dr Lester Walton dated 19 November 2015, 3-4; Coronial Brief, Statement of Constable Ryan O’Donnell dated 11 May 2015, 49-50; Coronial Brief, Statement of Hakki Behaettin dated 18 June 2015, 57

  1. Pursuant to section 73(1) of the Coroners Aci 2008, I order that this finding be published on

the internet.

  1. I direct that a copy of this finding be provided to the following: a) Tuncay Sahin, senior next of kin; and

b) Detective Leading Senior Constable Sean Patrick Toohey, Victoria Police, Coroner’s

Investigator.

Signature:

hyve

TAIN WEST ACTING STATE CORONER Date: 15 February 2019

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries are for educational purposes only and must not be treated as legal documents. Report an inaccuracy.