Coronial
VICICU

Finding into death of Peter Allen Bain

Deceased

Peter Allen Bain

Demographics

31y, male

Coroner

Coroner Darren Bracken

Date of death

2018-11-06

Finding date

2018-12-30

Cause of death

Aspiration Pneumonia

AI-generated summary

Peter Bain, a 31-year-old man with severe intellectual disability, autism, and multiple comorbidities, died from aspiration pneumonia. He was admitted to ICU following deterioration at a DHHS residential facility and died four days later. A pathologist noted a nasogastric tube appeared coiled in his mouth, but subsequent clinical review confirmed the tube was correctly positioned on chest X-ray and his deterioration reflected pneumonia progression rather than tube-related complications. The coroner found no evidence of inadequate care by DHHS staff or hospital clinicians. No clinical interventions were identified as potentially preventable contributors to death.

AI-generated summary — refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.

Specialties

respiratory medicineintensive caregastroenterologypathology

Drugs involved

EpilimSertralineZyprexaColoxyl with SennaMotiliumMovicol

Contributing factors

  • severe intellectual disability
  • autism spectrum disorder
  • motility disorder
  • aspiration risk
Full text

IN THE CORONERS COURT Court Reference: COR 2018 5611

OF VICTORIA AT MELBOURNE FINDING INTO DEATH WITHOUT INQUEST Form 38 Rule 60(2) Section 67 of the Coroners Act 2008

Findings of: CORONER DARREN J BRACKEN

Deceased: Peter Allen Bain

Date of birth: 20 February 1987

Date of death: 6 November 2018

Cause of death: Aspiration Pneumonia

Place of death: Box Hill Hospital, 8 Arnold Street, Box Hill, Victoria

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Background

The purpose of a coronial investigation

Matters in relation to which a finding must, if possible, be made

  • Identity of the deceased, pursuant to section 67(1)(a) of the Act

  • Cause of death, pursuant to section 67(1)(b) of the Act

  • Circumstances in which the death occurred, pursuant to section 67(1)(c)

of the Act Comments pursuant to section 67(3) of the Act

Findings and conclusion

HIS HONOUR: BACKGROUND

  1. On 6 November 2018, Peter Allen Bain was aged 31 years when he died in hospital of natural causes. At six years of age, Mr Bain came under the care of the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) and remained so for the rest of his life.! Immediately prior to his death, Mr Bain lived at 45 Lemon Grove, Nunawading (the DHHS residence), operated under the auspices of the DHHS. Mr Bain was totally dependent for all care

needs.” Mr Bain’s parents remained involved in ail aspects of his life.

  1. Mr Bain had a medical history that included severe intellectual disability with autistic tendencies (non-verbal),’ agitation, constipation, motility disorder and iron deficiency anaemia.* Mr Bain’s regular medications included Epilim,* Sertraline® and Zyprexa,’ and

several medications to manage his bowel functioning and gastrointestinal discomfort.®

  1. On9 March 2018, Mr Bain was admitted to Box Hill Hospital, Eastern Health (BHH) with vomiting and lethargy.” Earlier that day, Mr Bain swallowed pool water during his regular hydrotherapy session.'° Mr Bain was diagnosed with hyponatraemia!’ and aspiration pneumonia and remained in hospital for five weeks. Mr Bain suffered seizures during his

stay, and it was queried whether he had had a small seizure whilst in the pool.”

  1. On 20 May 2018, Mr Bain was admitted to BHH with agitation and fever. Mr Bain was unable to weight bear on his right foot. Despite investigations, the origin of the fever was

unascertained, and Mr Bain was discharged five days later.

1 Letter ftom Sally Lutter, DHHS, dated 8 November 2018; Statement of Paula Bain, dated 1 April 2019, Coronial Brief."

? Statement of Paula Bain, dated 1 April 2019, Coronial Brief; Statement of Valerio Milone, dated 22 March 2019, Coronial Brief.

3 Statement of Valerio Milone, dated 22 March 2019, Coronial Brief.

4 Statement of Dr Kolin Kun-Ying Lu, dated 28 February 2019, Coronial Brief.

5 Medication used to treat seizures.

§ Medication used to treat depression.

7 Medication used to treat mental/mood conditions including schizophrenia and bipolar.

® These included Coloxyl with Senna, Microlax Enema, Motilium, and Movicol; Statement of Dr Kolin Kun-Ying Lu, dated 28 February 2019, Coronial Brief.

? Medical Records, Box Hill Hospital Discharge Summary dated 20 April 2018.

10 Medical Records, Box Hill Hospital Discharge Summary dated 20 April 2018; Statement of Paula Bain, dated | April 2019, Coronial Brief.

'! A condition that occurs when the level of sodium in the blood is too low.

12 Statement of Paula Bain, dated 1 April 2019, Coronial Brief.

13 Medical Records, Box Hill Hospital Discharge Summary dated 31 May 2018.

  1. On 16 October 2018, Mr Bain attended BHH with behavioural changes, including an episode of fixed gaze.4 Mr Bain was diagnosed with acute behavioural disturbance with a

clinical impression of possible absence seizures.!> He was discharged later that evening.

THE PURPOSE OF A CORONIAL INVESTIGATION

  1. Mr Bain’s death constituted a ‘reportable death’ pursuant to section 4 of the Coroners Act (2008) (Vic) (“the Act”), as his death occurred in Victoria, and, immediately before his death,

Mr Bain was a person placed in custody or care.!®

  1. The Act requires a coroner to investigate reportable deaths such as Mr Bain’s, and, if possible, to find:

(a) the identity of the deceased.

(b) the cause of death and

(c) the circumstances in which death occurred.'”

  1. For coronial purposes, ‘circumstances in which death occurred’! refers to the context and background the death including the surrounding circumstances. Rather than being a consideration of all circumstances which might form part of a narrative culminating in the death, required findings in relation to circumstances are limited to those circumstances which

are sufficiently proximate to be considered relevant to the death.

  1. The coroner’s role is to establish facts, rather than to attribute or apportion blame for the death.!° It is not the coroner’s role to determine criminal or civil liability,? nor to determine

disciplinary matters.

  1. One of the broader purposes of coronial investigations is to contribute to a reduction in the number of preventable deaths, both through the observations made in the investigation

findings and by making recommendations.

11. Coroners are also empowered to:

14 Medical Records, Box Hill Hospital Discharge Summary dated 25 October 2018; 13 Medical Records, Box Hill Hospital Discharge Summary dated 25 October 2018; '$ Section 4 Coroners Act 2008.

'7 See Preamble and s 67, Coroners Act (2008).

'8 Section 67(1)(c).

'9 Keown v Khan (1999) 1 VR 69.

*4 Section 69 (1).

(a) report to the Attorney-General on a death;

(b) comment on any mattcr connected with the death investigated, including matters of

public health or safety and the administration of justice;?? and

(c) make recommendations to any Minister or public statutory authority on any matter connected with the death, including public health or safety or the administration of

justice.”

  1. Coronial findings must be underpinned by proof of relevant facts on the balance of probabilities.“ The strength of evidence necessary to so prove facts varies according to the

nature of the facts and the circumstances in which they are sought to be proved.**

  1. Proof of facts underpinning a finding that would, or may, have an extremely deleterious effect on a party’s character, reputation or employment prospects demand a weight of evidence commensurate with the gravity of the facts sought to be proved.” Facts should not be considered to have been proved on the balance of probabilities by inexact proofs, indefinite testimony, or indirect inferencés,”” rather such proof should be the result of clear, cogent or

strict proof in the context of a presumption of innocence.®

MATTERS IN RELATION TO WHICH A FINDING MUST, IF POSSIBLE, BE MADE Identity of the Deceased - Section 67(1)(a) of the Act

  1. On 7 November 2018, Kevin Bain identified the deceased as his son, Peter Allen Bain, born 20 February 1987.

15. Mr Bain’s identity is not in dispute and requires no further investigation.

21 Section 72(1).

2 Section 67(3).

23 Section 72(2).

% Re State Coroner; ex parte Minister for Health (2009) 261 ALR 152.

23 Qantas Airways Limited vy Gama (2008) 167 FCR 537 at [139] per Branson J but I note that His Honour was referring to the correct approach to the standard of proof in a civil proceeding in a federal court with reference to section 140 of the Evidence Act 1995 (Cth); Neat Holdings Pty Lid v Karajan Holdings Pty Ltd (1992) 67 ALJR 170 at 170-171 per Mason CJ, Brenna, Deane and Gaudron JJ.

26 Anderson v Blashki [1993] 2 VR 89, following Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336, referring to Barten v Williams (1978) 20 ACTR 10; Cuming Smith & Co Lid v Western Farmers Co-operative Ltd [1979] VR 129; Mahon v Air New Zealand Ltd [1984] AC 808 and Annetts v McCann (1990) 170 CLR 596.

” Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336, at pp. 362-3 per Dixon J.

8 Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336, at pp. 362-3 per Dixon J.; Cuming Smith & CO Ltd v Western Farmers Co-operative Ltd [1979] VR 129, at p. 147; Neat Holdings Pty Lid v Karajan Holdings Ptp Ltd (1992) 67 ALJR 170 at 170-171 per Mason CJ, Brenna, Deane and Gaudron JJ.

Cause of death - Section 67(1)(b) of the Act

On 9 November 2018, Dr Michael Burke, a Senior Pathologist practising at the Victorian Institute of Forensic Medicine, conducted an external examination upon Mr Bain’s body.

Dr Burke provided a written report, dated 9 November 2018, in which he opined that the

cause of Mr Bain’s death was ‘aspiration pneumonia’. | accept Dr Burke’s opinion.

Post mortem imaging showed a right pleural effusion and increased lung markings. The external examination was otherwise unremarkable. In accordance with the preference of Mr

Bain’s family, an autopsy was not performed.

Dr Burke advised there was no evidence to suggest the death was due to anything other than

natural causes.

Circumstances in which the death occurred - Section 67(1)(c) of the Act

19,

On 26 October 2018, Mr Bain attended his regular General Practitioner, Dr Kolin Kun-Ying Lu, with blank episodes of minimal response, loose bowels and a sore throat.” He was

diagnosed with a viral upper respiratory infection and advised to rest.

Mr Bain’s symptoms did not improve and at 6.00pm on 2 November 2018, staff at the DHHS Residence called an ambulance.*° Mr Bain was transferred to BHH where he was admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and treated with intravenous antibiotics for aspiration

pneumonia.?!

Mr Bain’s condition continued to deteriorate in the ICU and the decision was taken, in

conjunction with his family, to cease active treatment.*? Mr Bain passed away peacefully

surrounded by family at 6.10pm on 6 November 2018.73

COMMENTS PURSUANT TO SECTION 67(3) OF THE ACT

At the time of his death, Mr Bain was a ‘person placed in custody or care’ as defined in section 3 of the Coroners Act 2008 (the Act) because he was in the care of the DHHS

immediately prior to his death.**

8 Statement of Dr Kolin Kun-Ying Lu, dated 28 February 2019, Coronial Brief.

3° Statement of Valerio Milone, dated 22 March 2019, Coroniai Brief.

31 E-Medical Deposition Form; Medical Records, Box Hill Hospital ICU Admission Note dated 3 November 2018.

32 B-Medical Deposition Form; Statement of Paula Bain, dated 1 April 2019, Coronial Brief.

33 Statement of Dr John Dyett, dated 22 February 2019, Coronial Brief; Statement of Paula Bain, dated | April 2019, Coronial Brief.

Mr Bain’s designation as a ‘person placed in custody or care’ is significant. This is because the Act recognised that people in the control, care or custody of the State are vulnerable and therefore, irrespective of the nature of the death, requires it to be reported to the Coroner and

so subject to the independent scrutiny and accountability of a coronial investigation.

As an additional protection, until the insertion of section 52(3A) into the Act in November 2014, all deaths of people placed in custody or care required a mandatory inquest. Now, the Coroner is no longer required to hold an inquest if satisfied that the death was due to natural causes but must publish Findings made conceming natural causes death of people in custody or care.*> Of course, the Act preserves a discretionary power to hold an inquest in relation to

any death a Coroner is investigating.*®

In his autopsy report, Dr Burke commented that, during Mr Bain’s final admission at BHH, clinicians inserted a nasogastric tube in an incorrect position (in the oropharynx) which caused coughing. Mr Bain’s coughing resolved, however he continued to deteriorate the

following day and active treatment was ceased.

In his statement dated 22 February 2019, Dr John Dyett of Eastern Health responded to Dr Burke’s comment. Dr Dyett stated that at 8.38am on 5 November 2018, clinicians attempted a routine insertion of a nasogastric tube to facilitate enteral nutrition. At about 4.00pm, following the onset of feeds, Mr Bain was noted to yawn and the nasogastric tube was observed to be coiled in the back of his mouth. The tube was removed immediately. Dr Dyett noted there was no evidence that the nasogastric tube was incorrectly positioned, to the contrary, a chest x-ray performed at 12.55pm confirmed that the tip of the tube was

37 A subsequent chest x-ray at 6.25pm showed

appropriately situated below the diaphragm.

bilateral consolidation. Accordingly, Dr Dyett considered that Mr Bain’s deterioration on the evening of 5 November 2018 was more likely due to the natural progression of his pneumonia

rather than the insertion of the nasogastric tube or enteral feeding.*®

Relying on the advice provided by Dr Burke and the subsequent statement of Dr Dyett, I am satisfied that Mr Bain’s death was due to natural causes. The available evidence does not

support a finding either that there was any want of care on the part of DHHS or the staff at the

  • See section 3 for the definition of a “person placed in custody or care” and section 4(2)(c) of the definition of “reportable death’.

Section 73(1B).

36 Section 51(1).

37 E-medical deposition Form.

38 Statement of Dr John Dyett, dated 22 February 2019, Coronial Brief.

DHHS Residence, was a cause of Mr Bain’s death, or that any want of clinical management

or care on the part of the staff at BHH was a cause of his death.

I am satisfied, having considered all of the available evidence, that no further investigation

into Mr Bain’s death is required.

FINDINGS AND CONCLUSION

Having investigated the death, without holding an inquest, | make the following findings pursuant to section 67(1) of the Coroners Act 2008:

(a) The identity of the deceased was Peter Allen Bain, born 20 February 1987;

(b) Mr Bain’s death occurred; i. on 6 November 2018 at Box Hill Hospital, 8 Arnold Street, Box Hill, Victoria; .

ii. from Aspiration Pneumonia; and iii. in the circumstances described in paragraphs 19 — 21 above.

Pursuant to section 73(1B) of the Act, I order that this finding be published on the internet in

accordance with the rules.

I direct that a copy of this finding be provided to the following:

(a) Paula Bain, senior next of kin.

(b) Kevin Bain, senior next of kin.

(c) Dr Yvette Kozielski, Eastern Health.

(d) Leading Senior Constable Anthony Magner, Coroner’s Investigator, Victoria Police.

Signature: /

a

if i x

RREN J BRACKEN

CORONER

Date: 30 bemer 207

——

a

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries are for educational purposes only and must not be treated as legal documents. Report an inaccuracy.